翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Duarte ・ R v Dudley and Stephens ・ R v Dyment ・ R v Dytham ・ R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co ・ R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd ・ R v Evans ・ R v Ewanchuk ・ R v Faulkner ・ R v Fearon ・ R v Feeney ・ R v Finta ・ R v Forlee ・ R v G ・ R v George ・ R v Ghosh ・ R v Glad Day Bookshops Inc ・ R v Gladstone ・ R v Gladue ・ R v Gnango ・ R v Godoy ・ R v Goltz ・ R v Gonzales ・ R v Grant ・ R v Grantham ・ R v Grillo ・ R v Gruenke ・ R v Guerin ・ R v Généreux ・ R v Hall Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Ghosh ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Ghosh ''R v Ghosh'' () (EWCA Crim 2 ) is an English criminal law case, dealing with dishonesty, deception and theft. It is relevant in prosecutions under, for example, the Theft Act 1968,〔Theft Act 1968〕 the Fraud Act 2006,〔Fraud Act 2006〕 the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Immigration and Asylum Act. ==Facts== Dr Ghosh was a surgeon. He was convicted of four offences under the Theft Act 1968 sections 20(2) and 15(1). During his work as a locum surgeon he obtained money by claiming fees for work that others had carried out, or that had been carried out under England's National Health Service. The jury found him guilty and he appealed on the basis that the trial judge had told the jury to use their common sense to determine whether the accused's conduct had been dishonest or not. Ghosh argued that the judge should have instructed the jury that dishonesty was about the accused’s state of mind (a subjective test) rather than the jury’s point of view (an objective test). 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Ghosh」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.